Persons who proceed without the required authorisation for atmospheric emission activities will now be required to apply for retrospective authorisation and could be liable for a maximum administrative fine of up to R5m.
This is according to Sandra Gore, Director in the Environmental Practice at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, who says that this is one of a number of amendments to the National Environmental Management: Air Quality Act (AQ) that came into force on 19 May 2014.
Gore explains, “Should a person apply for retrospective authorisation, the competent authorities are given wide discretion as to what should be required from the applicant. This may include ceasing all operations until authorisation is granted and requiring such a party to take steps to remediate any adverse effect of the activity on the environment, including human health,” she notes.
Gore notes that the National Prosecuting Authority may still institute criminal prosecution for conducting activities unlawfully, despite payment of the administrative fine.
“Criminal penalties under the AQA are a maximum fine and imprisonment of up to R5m and/or 5 years for a first offence (or both.) The decision to issue a retrospective authorisation to an applicant may be deferred until the National Prosecuting Authority decides whether to prosecute and criminal proceedings have been finalised.”
“Parties who do not obtain the required authorisation can therefore be liable to pay up to R10m in fines,” she adds.
- Sasol needs more time to meet air pollution laws
- Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, SA’s number one large law firm by PMR Africa for seventh year in a row
- Centralised lubrication systems for water and wastewater treatment
- SNC-Lavalin helps customers prepare for new carbon tax
- Squid exporters receive competition law exemption