The South African Property Owners Association (Sapoa) is concerned that the City ofย Cape Townย is not receiving the necessary income needed to fundย projectsย for emergencyย waterย supply augmentationย projectsthat were launched in mid-2017.
The city proposed to raise the funding through the imposition of a drought charge.
โWhile the proposed charge will affect residential and commercial properties alike, the lower threshold of R50 000 for commercial properties means that the charge will have a broad impact on the industry,โ Sapoa said in a statement on Monday.
The association added that the proposed drought charge was an additional tax and queried how the city foresaw charging such a tax when taxes were only imposed at national level.
ย
โSapoa understands andย accepts thatย the supply augmentationย projectsย will costย money and weย feel strongly thatย recovering theย drought charge uniformly,ย according toย a propertyย rates valuation, gives no recognition to those consumers who have heeded the call to saveย water,โ it said.
The association further stated that the calculation of the drought charge was in no way linked toย waterย consumption in aย building.
โAny charge, if imposed, should be funded by a charge againstย waterย consumption and not against theย buildingย value.โ
ย
Sapoa pointed out that the scheduleย it received from the City ofย Cape Townย stops at R500-millionย for commercialย properties and queried theย consideration whereย the property values were above thisย figure.
โForย buildings approaching R1-billion in value, theย amount ofย the drought charge wouldย be exorbitant. Sapoa impresses on the city to keep it informed of the next steps and the progress that is being made with regards to the proposal.
ย
ย